Within the next few weeks, the Supreme Court will decide whether the cornerstone of securities class action litigation embraced in the1988 case of Basic v. Levinson should remain in intact or be turned on its head as critics have proposed. The Basic decision allowed the "fraud on the market" theory, which assumes that public information about a company is known to the market, and plaintiffs do not have to show that they relied on a specific misrepresentation to sue those companies. This theory made class action lawsuits in securities fraud cases easier for plaintiffs to pursue and dramatically increased securities class action litigation. Between 1997 and 2012, more than 3,000 private class action securities fraud lawsuits were filed, generating more than $73 billion in legal settlements. Before the Supreme Court this term is Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund, which could potentially chart a new course for these lawsuits, by overturning Basic, limiting the “fraud on the market” theory, or finding a middle ground to allow publicly-traded companies better defenses against securities class actions without overruling a 26-year old precedent that made it easier for plaintiffs to negotiate large settlements. Join us for a vibrant discussion of the case and its implications for future securities fraud class action litigation.
Friday, June 13, 2014 12:00 PM - 1:00 PMEastern Time Zone
Rayburn House Office BuildingRoom 2237Washington, District of Columbia 20515USA703.993.9963
Cvent Online Event Registration Software | Copyright © 2000-2014 Cvent Inc. All rights reserved.